We've been getting questions about how Teahouse compares other protocols out there. So, we’ve put together this straightforward overview, which compares the performance of Teahouse pools against Gamma's pools, focusing on APR performance for various liquidity pairs. This overview showcases our competitive edge in the automated liquidity management space.

TL;DR:

Features: Teahouse provides automated compounding of rewards.

Performance: Across most liquidity pairs, regardless of type, Teahouse demonstrates superior performance compared to Gamma, even when factoring in impermanent loss.

Comparison

The key difference between Teahouse and Gamma is Teahouse's automated compounding of rewards. Users who deposit into Teahouse’s incentivized vaults won't need to constantly and manually claim and stake rewards to boost their returns—Teahouse's auto-compounding feature handles it all.

For performance, we examined the APR performance across three key categories: volatile pairs, ETH-USD pairs, and pegged pairs.

Some notes about our data:

• The APR used for comparison is True APR (which includes the realization of IL).
• Data and calculations were taken on July 30, 2024.
• The pools compared excluded any pools that are boosted by rewards (excluding reward APR).
• Given that the majority of pools are less than 3 months old, we used a 1-month APR as the primary comparison index (unless otherwise noted).

Volatile Pairs

ETH - USD Pairs